Paradigm shift in the choice of the end
Paradigm shift in the choice of the end
Regarding the later rise of civilization and the end of mankind, what should we do today if such an event is definitive, inevitable, and unavoidable? What will you be thinking, making a decision, and choosing right now? Such a choice may have to deal with new changes that are completely different from the existing standards of thinking. Paradigm (PARADIGM) refers to a system of perception or a theoretical framework that fundamentally defines the views and thoughts of people in a certain era, a concept proposed by the American philosopher Thomas Kuhn in the early 20th century. In modern times, where the flow of change is rapid, the change in thinking standards is often used as an expression of 'paradigm shift'.
For example, in the ancient Chinese Zhou dynasty, a new social transformation to a patrilineal society by overthrowing the matrilineal society tradition, or the transition from celestial to heliocentric in European medieval astronomy. In those days, these events were revolutionary, and most of them were serious problems that could not be accommodated in a short period of time. In other words, it is not an understanding and gradual progress based on objective observation and persuasion, but a new concept that people and groups of researchers must suddenly accept. It is a revolution and a remarkable breakthrough in technology. Although these great inflection points of civilization were incidental changes brought about by the paradigm shift, their impact was always greater than expected. The emergence of the Baek Family of Disciples of the Spring and Autumn Period and the emergence of the Renaissance in the Middle Ages were incidental actions that occurred at such an inflection point.
CONCEPT (槪念, CONCEPT) is an idea outlined by taking out common and general things from the objects around us. However, since concepts borrow linguistic expressions, they have limitations in conveying and correct interpretation of meaning. The moment we grasp and conceptualize the constantly changing object, the influence and relevance of the intended meaning change and decrease. In general, progress is recognized as development by the accumulation of conservatives, but anomalies discovered during the period of revolution press and force a completely new paradigm shift. A new paradigm always poses new questions and changes the rules and 'map' of the game beyond solving the problems of the previous paradigm.
ECHART TOLLE, a person with great spirituality, defines understanding and acceptance as a response to ‘THIS IS IT’ to everything that happens at every moment of life. In other words, you can find peace by letting go of attachment or resistance to a particular moment. In other words, acceptance is allowing; I see it as acknowledging and allowing unwanted thoughts and feelings to come and go without fighting with them. This operation of the mind is similar to bangha, in Buddhism, where one puts down desires and attachments in order to attain enlightenment. When the great monks hear the news, they put it down, not by neglect or neglect, but by actively accepting it, meaning that they face the problem and overcome it together.
In addition, in Western Christianity, God has one essence, but exists in three different forms: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the Christian doctrine of Trinity. ) or the Trinity (三位一体). If we reinterpret this Trinity theory as a new paradigm, we come to the conclusion that the various multiverses are ultimately ‘The One’ that does not distinguish or distinguish each one. This is because the diversity that appears before your eyes is nothing more than a fundamentally different aspect.
A person (位格, HYPOSTASIS) is a being who thinks and acts with free will, and is the three manifestations of the divine. Even in Buddhism, there is a concept of the Trinity (三身, TRIKAYA) similar to the Trinity in Christianity. This is the doctrine of the Buddha that all beings have three bodies: the Dharma body, the Bodhisattva, and the Incarnation. Indian Brahman, before Buddhism, refers to the fundamental reality of the universe in Hinduism. If atman is the individual principle of the true self, then Brahman is the total universal principle. Around 600 BC, in ancient India, Brahman and Atman were one, and the idea of BRAHMAN/ATMAN was compiled by the Upanishad, a mystical/esoteric text. The Buddhist doctrine also forms a main stream in this thought.
If we look inside the human being, we can find the same Trinity. As a circulatory body, the spirit is a spirit body that has its own vocation and has achieved the present life, and reason and emotion form an external thinking action that operates on the body to form a body, and it is a body that governs the pure physiological action that is limitedly applied to the body. The autonomic nervous system forms a white body, composing the trinity. You exist as you are because these three persons are united as one. So, you are the Trinity.
The whole is divided into parts, and the parts are put together to form a whole. There are no restrictions and boundaries to gather and disperse in things, but human perception is accustomed to individualizing parts and wholes. It recognizes the parts as individual entities and fails to integrate the whole. The principle of three gathering to become one and being divided into three is the foundation of life. It gathers, scatters, and repeats without discrimination and distinction. Just as divinity is achieved, so is humanity. Therefore, it is impossible to distinguish between the Pan-Is and the Trinity. By distinguishing individuals and accepting them as they are, they come together to complete one, achieve life through that completion, and then disperse into individual individuals again. The cycle of life and death is made up of the Trinity and disperses into three forms. The Trinity is the formula of life.